I came to read The Case of the Deadly Desperados with a certain excitement and apprehension – excitement because The Roman Mysteries were a large part of my childhood reading, and apprehension because I was worried that The Case of the Deadly Desperados, or more broadly The P.K Pinkerton Mysteries, would not be to the standard of The Roman Mysteries.
The Case of the Deadly Desperados is different. It HAS to be different. I think that had it had any similarity to The Roman Mysteries, it would have felt a lot weaker, but Caroline Lawrence made a wise and (probably conscientious) decision to make the setting, period, and style very different to The Roman Mysteries. This difference affords The Case of the Deadly Desperados to become its own book and not just be “the new series by the author of The Roman Mysteries”.
For one, Caroline Lawrence chooses a very interesting character to focus on. P.K. Pinkerton is half Sioux and half white, which makes him the target of much ridicule, but Pinky doesn’t really care. His father left him with a legacy and P.K. is adamant on following in his fathers rail-road detective footsteps all the way to Chicago to join the Pinkerton Detective Agency.
For now, however, he will have to put his dreams on hold- something more pressing is taking priority: a life-or-death matter. Someone has hunted P.K. and his adoptive parents out and killed his Ma and his Pa, and they didn’t find what they were looking for. P.K. can only run but that won’t stop him trying to bring them to justice…
P.K. is unique character- and I think most people will be able to sympathise with him. He evidently has an element of autism/Aspergers Syndrome, and he finds it extremely difficult to read and understand peoples’ emotions. This “thorn” means he is at an immediate disadvantage, but his strengths make up for that; P.K. can remember copious amounts of facts, and give him any two numbers and he can add, multiply, divide or subtract them in seconds- regardless of size.
While The Case of the Deadly Desperados does not concentrate on the characters surrounding P.K. much, the supporting characters do offer variety and have their own personalities and traits which really brings them to life. Some of them are very stereo-typically- purposefully, I suspect- whilst others are not so obviously western-ised.
The Case of the Deadly Desperados is written in first person, and again this was a very clever decision and really suits the story and characters. Caroline Lawrence really becomes P.K. as she writes this, really bringing out his unique character in her writing style. More than anything, the narrative voice is what really helps us understand and like P.K. – inclusive of his quirks (he frequently suggests that he is “partial to black coffee”, which I found quite amusing!).
I never really considered myself a fan of Westerns (and this was probably another reason I was apprehensive of reading this). I always considered Westerns to be a genre for a different generation, but I must admit that The Case of the Deadly Desperados has convinced me to think differently. The plot and story are fast, fun, and unique- a wonderful mixture that really makes this a book and series worth reading.